Appellate Court Opinions
Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.
15,425 Appellate Court Opinions
State v. Dobson
motion to suppress; vehicle search; industrial hemp; odor of marijuana; probable cause
State v. Grant
Fifth Amendment; N.C. Const. art. I, section 23; N.C. Gen. Stat. section 8-54; right not to testify; improper comment; closing argument;
T.H. v. SHL Health Two, Inc.
Motion to Dismiss; Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice; Rule 60(b)(1); Rule 60(b)(6); Affirmed.
Court of Appeals Published Opinions Filed April 2, 2024
Ayers v. Currituck Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs.
office of administrative hearings review, just cause, and unacceptable personal conduct.
Dan King Plumbing Heating & Air, LLC v. Harrison
Order granting a new trial; Appeal as of right; UDTP (unfair and deceptive trade practices); Remand; Conform to appellate opinion; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-53; N.C. R. Civ. P. 63; Entry of judgment.
Garland v. Orange Cnty.
motion to partially dismiss appeal, motion to dismiss cross-appeal, PWC, enforcement of settlement agreement, motion to dismiss on untimely complaint.
Griffing v. Gray, Layton, Kersh, Solomon, Furr & Smith, P.A.
interlocutory jurisdiction; substantial right; arbitration; no valid agreement to arbitrate; equitable estoppel; third-party beneficiary
Hunter Haven Farms, LLC v. The City of Greenville Bd. of Adjustment
N.C. Gen. Stat. 160D-1402; quasi-judicial decision; petition for writ of certiorari; participation in proceedings;
Knuckles v. Simpson
Petition for determination of abandonment, willful abandonment, factual findings supported by sufficient evidence, credibility and weight of evidence
N.C. Cemetery Comm'n v. Smoky Mountain Mem'l Parks, Inc.
Unauthorized transfer of land designated as cemetery in violation of NC Cemetery Act
State v. Hernandez
PWC; merit; plain error; de novo; magistrate; great deference; substantial basis; probable cause; nexus; reasonable cause; incriminating evidence; reasonable inference; prudent; practical; purely conclusory; underlying circumstances; training and experience; IAC; prejudice; double jeopardy; sole basis
State v. Taylor
DWI, Highway collision, Inhalants, Preservation of constitutional issues, N.C. R. App. P. 10(a)(4), Sixth Amendment, Expert witness, Right to confrontation, Rule of Evidence 404(b), Rule of Evidence 403, Evidence of malice.
State v. Walker
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-190.16(a)(1); First-degree sexual exploitation of a minor; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-190.17(a)(2); Second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor; Lesser-included offense; Witness improperly instructing the jury; Misnaming the charged offense; Curative Instruction
Turpin v. Charlotte Latin Sch., Inc.
Appeal by plaintiffs from TC's granting in part/denying in part defendants' 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss nine claims of plaintiffs re: fraud, UDTP, negligent misrepresentation, negligent infliction of emotional distress, negligent supervision and retention, slander, libel, breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
Supreme Court Opinions Filed March 22, 2024
Beavers v. McMican
Whether post-separation conduct can be used to corroborate pre-separation conduct in alienation of affection and criminal conversation claims and whether the pre-separation evidence in this case gave rise to more than mere conjecture that defendant was plaintiff's wife's alleged paramour.
Bradshaw v. Maiden
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's orders on defendants' motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment.
Est. of Graham v. Lambert
Whether the Court of Appeals properly held that a municipality waived governmental immunity because the complaint sufficiently plead waiver, and whether summary judgment was properly awarded for a municipality and a police officer on claims brought under N.C.G.S. 20-145.
Halikierra Cmty. Servs. LLC v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.
Whether plaintiff demonstrated genuine issues of material fact sufficient to survive summary judgment on claims that defendant North Carolina Department Health and Human Services arbitrarily and capriciously placed plaintiff on Medicaid prepayment review in violation of its state constitutional substantive due process and equal protection rights.