summary judgment; development approvals; off-site improvements; municipal authority; statutory construction; attorneys' fees; reimbursement; exaction; mandamus; mootness

motion to dismiss; standing; breach of contract

worker's compensation, findings of fact

Workers' Compensation Act; subrogation; choice of law; distribution of attorneys' fees and costs

Industrial commission; subject matter jurisdiction; claims of negligence; intentional torts; constitutional claims.

covenants, residential lot, real property, neighborhood, subdivision, summary judgment, maintenance, assessment, restrictive covenant, ascertainable standard, real covenant

Industrial Commission, negligent, loss of use and enjoyment, right to compensation, value

interlocutory appeal; appeal of a superior court's remand to a municipal board for further proceedings is interlocutory; special-use permit; attorney's fees

appellate review, reply brief, summary judgment, abandoned

sanction, Rule 11, lying, lawful activities.

DWI, revoke, refused, chemical analysis, reasonable grounds, under the influence, asleep, due process, DMV employee

Red light cameras; subject-matter jurisdiction; exhaustion of administrative remedies; adequate state remedy; standing; N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 89C-23, 10; procedural due process; substantive due process; N.C. Const. Art. IX, § 7; Fines and Forfeitures Clause.

Reversing and remanding where settlement agreement provision is ambiguous.

Wills and trusts; mental capacity; undue influence; summary judgment; directed verdict; affidavit; petition for attorneys fees.

Interlocutory; governmental immunity; public official immunity; and gross negligence

Motion to dismiss; discontinuance of summons; preservation.

involuntary commitment, dangerous to self, counsel, due process, preservation, witness

juvenile delinquency; trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress where juvenile suspect's furtive movements and officer's personal knowledge of juvenile's prior firearms offenses provided officer with reasonable suspicion to conduct a weapons frisk; testimony regarding comprehensive clinical assessment was not required and assessment qualified as an interdisciplinary evaluation