Appellate Court Opinions
Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.
32,728 Appellate Court Opinions
Reid v. State
Motion to Dismiss as Frivolous, Motion to Amend Complaint, Moorish American National
State v Bohannon
Felony child abuse inflicting serious bodily injury; Prosecutor's Closing Remarks
State v Crandell
criminal, motion to suppress, reasonable suspicion to stop
State v Portillo
First degree murder; Motion to suppress; Confessions; Miranda custody analysis; Technical violations of the Criminal Procedure Act; Self-serving exculpatory statements
State v Sawyers
community care taking exception; seizure; reasonable suspicion; NCGS § 20-16.2
State v. Brice
Indictment
State v. Bumpers
Possession of a firearm by a felon; Constructive possession; Motion to dismiss- sufficiency of the evidence.
State v. Byrd
jury selection; record on appeal.
State v. Crook
Motion to suppress; jury instructions; prior record level
State v. Dowell
Motion to suppress, reasonable suspicion to conduct investigatory stop, admission of hearsay evidence on cross-examination
State v. Dulin
criminal, motion to dismiss, actual or constructive possession, possession of marijuana with intent to sell or deliver
State v. Fleming
Common Law Robbery; Conspiracy; Rule 404(b); Video Evidence. Sentencing.
State v. Gann
First Degree Arson; Occupied; Inhabited; Indictment.
State v. Hinton-Davis
Closing Argument; Restitution.
State v. Jones
Breaking or Entering; Sufficient Evidence; Due Process.
State v. Lewis
Clerical error; judgment must conform to sentence imposed
State v. Navarro
Bond forfeiture; extraordinary circumstances
State v. Oakley
Business records exception; motion to dismiss
TD Bank, N.A. v. Williams
Deficiency Judgment Act, Summary Judgment, Property Value.
Weideman v. Shelton
Child custody dispute between parent and nonparent; Non-biological grandmother, intervenor, who helped raise child had standing to intervene in child custody proceedings but was not entitled to custody or visitation where intervenor failed to demonstrate that mother was unfit or acted inconsistently with her protected parental status; Mother's decision to grant exclusive custody of her child to child's biological grandmother was not conduct inconsistent with her protected status, where evidence showed intervenor had purposefully impeded mother's ability to assume her role as her child's parent, and this custodial arrangement allowed mother to assume her role as her child's mother in future.