Appellate Court Opinions

Slip opinions (court's decision in a case) filed and written by the justices of the Supreme Court or judges of the Court of Appeals

Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.

34,134 Appellate Court Opinions

, Court of Appeals , COA12-1435 (Judge Douglas McCullough) , Published
State v Sheppard

Larceny from the person and felony larceny of goods worth more than $1,000 and classification as an habitual felon.

, Court of Appeals , COA12-1498 (Judge Sanford Steelman) , Published
State v Storm

Jury Instructions; Lay Opinion Testimony; Closing Argument

, Supreme Court , 275PA11 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v. Brent

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert witness gave her opinion, based on the testing performed by a non-testifying chemical analyst, that the substance was cocaine.

, Supreme Court , 235PA10 (Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.) , Published
State v. Brewington

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert who did not conduct tests identifying a substance as cocaine testified to the results of a chemical analysis done by a non-testifying chemist

, Supreme Court , 322PA10 (Justice Barbara Jackson) , Published
State v. Craven

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert who did not conduct tests identifying substances as cocaine testified to the results of chemical analyses done by non-testifying chemists

, Supreme Court , 141PA10 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Hough

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert who did not conduct tests identifying substances as marijuana and cocaine testified to the results of a chemical analysis done by a non-testifying chemist

, Supreme Court , 505PA10 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Hurt

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights apply to testimony before a jury in a noncapital sentencing proceeding

, Supreme Court , 329PA11 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v. Ortiz-Zape

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert witness gave her opinion, based on the testing performed by a non-testifying chemical analyst, that the substance was cocaine.

, Supreme Court , 533PA10 (Justice Sarah Parker) , Published
State v. Williams

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert who did not conduct tests identifying a substance as cocaine testified to the results of a chemical analysis done by a non-testifying chemist