Appellate Court Opinions
Search Case Summaries / Headnotes.
View PDF Volumes.
35,613 Appellate Court Opinions
State v. McCullen
Jury instructions; first degree murder by torture; involuntary manslaughter
State v. McLymore
Self-Defense, Rule 404(b)
State v. Moore
pre-trial waiver of right to counsel, N.C.G.S. 15A-1242, range of permissible punishment
State v. Murray
Waiver, failure to object, plain error review.
State v. Pitts
motion to suppress; reasonable suspicion; investigatory stop
State v. Prince
Assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury, assault by strangulation, single course of conduct, sentencing
State v. Ray
search and seizure; motion to suppress; fees
State v. Reaves-Smith
North Carolina Eyewitness Identification Reform Act, Show-ups
State v. Ricks
closing arguments; improper remarks during summation; Fifth Amendment right to remain silent; prosecutor's fallacy; satellite based monitoring; hearing and showing required to impose satellite based monitoring
State v. Rivera
Sex offense; Rule 403; Abuse of discretion standard; Exclusion of evidence victim also reported abuse by another individual
State v. Rucker
Abscond, willful, avoid supervision, whereabouts unknown, clerical error, probation revocation.
State v. Silver
failure to preserve objection to denial of motion to suppress evidence; failure to specifically argue plain error on appeal
State v. Taylor
Jury Instruction
Guilty Knowledge
Plain Error
State v. Williams
Drug offenses; Identification of controlled substance; Correction of typographical mistake in indictment
State v. Willis
SBM, Fourth Amendment Search, Grady III
State v. Zachary
restitution evidentary support; NCGS 15A-1340.36
Walker v. Surles
Child Support, Motion for Contempt, Show Cause, Lack of Jurisdiction
Williams v. Williams
Alimony, Income Withholding, Jurisdiction
Supreme Court Opinions Filed May 1, 2020
Chappell v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.
In an inverse condemnation proceeding for a Map Act taking, did the trial court's jury instructions and evidentiary rulings erroneously characterize the nature of the taking in a way that prejudiced the Department of Transportation, was the trial court's decision to reject a quick take counterclaim on the eve of trial an abuse of discretion, and did the trial court properly take account of property taxes and correctly calculate pre-judgment interest.