Court of Appeals

, Court of Appeals , COA22-209 (Judge Darren Jackson) , Unpublished
Elliot Moore Hines v. Chelle C. Nichols

trial court's conclusions supported its determination that father have sole decision-making authority for educational needs of child but inconsistencies in the court's order that father pay for the child's education and inclusion of the expense in the child support award required remand

, Court of Appeals , COA22-164 (Judge Richard Dietz) , Unpublished
Best Asset Grp. v. Rosa Jacobs

Interlocutory appeal; order granting motion to change venue for convenience of witnesses and to promote ends of justice; sufficiency of statement of grounds for appellate review; substantial right

, Court of Appeals , COA22-19 (Judge Allegra Collins) , Published
The Ascot Corp., LLC v. I&R Waterproofing, Inc.

North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 14; Third-party Practice; Breach of Express Warranty; Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability; Indemnity; Contribution; Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss

, Court of Appeals , COA22-260 (Judge Lucy Inman) , Published
State v. Walker

First-Degree Murder; Premeditation and Deliberation; Motion to Dismiss; Jury Instructions; Self-Defense; Stand Your Ground Instruction

, Court of Appeals , COA22-97 (Judge John Tyson) , Published
State v. Hawkins

Rape of a Child;
Appellate Rules Violations;
Appellate Rules 2,3,4 and 10;
Defective Notice of Appeal;
Petition of Writ of Certiorari;
Showing of Merit and Prejudice;
Exclusion & Limitation of Expert Witness testimony;
Abuse of Discretion

, Court of Appeals , COA21-670 (Judge John Tyson) , Published
State v. Woodley

1st Degree Murder;
Covid-19 Protocols;
Emergency Directives;
Chief Justices Authority;
N.C. Gen Stat. 7A-39(b)(2)
Superior Court Jurisdiction;
Motion to Continue;
Courtroom Capacity;
Jury Selection;
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

, Court of Appeals , COA22-441 (Judge Darren Jackson) , Published
In re: B.S.

remand was required where trial court failed to conduct the statutorily required inquiry for a respondent in an involuntary commitment proceeding who chose to proceed pro se; court was required to inquire into the respondent's age, mental condition, education, and the extent to which the respondent understood the complexity of the case

, Court of Appeals , COA21-373 (Judge Donna Stroud) , Published
Eidson v. Kakouras

Child Support, substantial change of circumstances, stipulation, past-due support

Subscribe to Court of Appeals