Court of Appeals

, Court of Appeals , COA22-103 (Judge Richard Dietz) , Unpublished
Heidi M. Williams v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

Unemployment claim; dismissal of petition for judicial review; N.C. Gen. Stat. 96-15(h); jurisdictional deadline for service of petition

, Court of Appeals , COA22-228 (Judge Lucy Inman) , Unpublished
Barry Dean Bodenhamer v. Kelly Brown-Bodenhamer

joint legal custody with primary physical custody of twin children to Father; children's familial and educational support; findings supported by substantial evidence; unchallenged findings; no abuse of discretion in physical custody assignment

, Court of Appeals , COA22-116 (Judge Lucy Inman) , Published
Coles v. Sugarleaf Labs, Inc.

Motion to Compel Arbitration; Revised Uniform Arbitration Act; Federal Arbitration Act; Interlocutory Order; Final Judgment; Appellate Jurisdiction

, Court of Appeals , COA22-135 (Judge Allegra Collins) , Published
The N.C. State Bar v. Megaro

adequate evidence to support the DHC's findings of fact, and the findings of fact adequately support the conclusions of law where Defendant entered into a representation agreement with brothers who did not have the capacity to understand the agreement due to their low IQs and adaptive functioning deficits

, Court of Appeals , COA22-258 (Judge John Tyson) , Published
State v. Tabb

Possession and Distribution of Illegal drugs;
U.S. Constitution 4th Amendment;
Search and Seizure;
N.C. Constitution Article 1, §20;
Stationary vehicle;
Reasonable Suspicion;
Detention of individual;
Plain view;
Industrial Hemp;
Probable cause

, Court of Appeals , COA21-10 (Judge Valerie Zachary) , Published
State v. Teague

postal interdiction; motion to suppress; waiver of appellate review; Industrial Hemp Act; motion to dismiss; lay opinion testimony; identification of marijuana as a controlled substance; conspiracy; statements of a co-conspirator

, Court of Appeals , COA22-70 (Judge Allegra Collins) , Published
State v. Kelly

unpreserved error: defense did not move to strike officer's nonresponsive opinion testimony; officer's nonresponsive opinion testimony was not plain error; state produced sufficient evidence that defendant was the perpetrator; double jeopardy: armed robbery of two employees of the same store supports judgment for only a single armed robbery.

, Court of Appeals , COA21-674 (Judge Donna Stroud) , Published
State v. Ambriz

speedy trial, motion to dismiss, trafficking, Barker v. Wingo

Subscribe to Court of Appeals