Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 318A24 (Justice Anita Earls) , Published
Mauck v. Cherry Oil Co.

Whether the Business Court erred in dismissing a claim for judicial dissolution under N.C.G.S. 55-14-30(2)(ii) for lack of standing when the plaintiff-shareholder held the contractual right to exercise a put option and sell their shares back to the company at fair market value.

, Supreme Court , 282PA24 (Justice Richard Dietz) , Published
State v. Chemuti

Whether N.C.G.S. 132-1.4A provides the exclusive procedure by which a criminal defendant in district court may request release of law enforcement agency recordings covered by the statute.

, Supreme Court , 166A24 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Lail

Whether the Court of Appeals properly concluded the trial court prejudicially erred when it excluded a handwritten note written by the complaining witness.

, Supreme Court , 151A24 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
State v. Norman

Whether probable cause supported a warrant to search defendant's vehicle.

, Supreme Court , 71PA24 (Justice Allison Riggs) , Published
Land v. Whitley

Whether defendants had a right of immediate appellate review of the trial court's interlocutory order denying defendants' motions to dismiss based on a claim of statutory immunity under the Emergency or Disaster Treatment Protection Act.

, Supreme Court , 338PA23 (Justice Trey Allen) , Published
N.C. Dep't of Env't Quality v. N.C. Farm Bureau Fed'n, Inc.

Whether the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources, unlawfully incorporated certain conditions into general permits for animal waste management systems without satisfying the rulemaking requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.

, Supreme Court , 307PA23 (Justice Phil Berger Jr.) , Published
State v. Wilson

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding step one of the Batson inquiry was moot.

, Supreme Court , 173PA23 (Per Curiam) , Published
Southland Nat'l Ins. Corp. v. Lindberg

Whether reliance is reasonable in a claim for fraud in the inducement when the complaining party failed to conduct any material due diligence on the representations and warranties upon which the fraud claim is based.

, Supreme Court , 121A23 (Justice Richard Dietz) , Published
Mitchell v. Univ. of N.C. Bd. of Governors

Whether courts interpreting state rules and regulations must defer to the legal interpretation of the state agency responsible for promulgating those rules and regulations.

Subscribe to Supreme Court