Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 28A23 (Justice Tamara Barringer) , Published
Terry v. Pub. Serv. Co. of N.C.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred by reversing an entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff's claims of common law negligence, negligence per se, violation of the North Carolina Residential Rental Agreements Act, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability.

, Supreme Court , 43PA23 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Boyette

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation hearings.

, Supreme Court , 52A23 (Per Curiam) , Published
Bradshaw v. Maiden

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's orders on defendants' motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment.

, Supreme Court , 59A23 (Justice Allison Riggs) , Published
Halikierra Cmty. Servs. LLC v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.

Whether plaintiff demonstrated genuine issues of material fact sufficient to survive summary judgment on claims that defendant North Carolina Department Health and Human Services arbitrarily and capriciously placed plaintiff on Medicaid prepayment review in violation of its state constitutional substantive due process and equal protection rights.

, Supreme Court , 194A23 (Per Curiam) , Published
In re A.H.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred by reversing the trial court's order adjudicating as neglected and dependent a child whose father abandoned his pursuit of her after she ran across a busy road.

, Supreme Court , 347A23 (Per Curiam) , Published
In re Foster

Review of recommendation for suspension.

, Supreme Court , 202PA22 (Justice Tamara Barringer) , Published
State v. Walker

Whether the Court of Appeals properly affirmed the denial of defendant's motion for appropriate relief.

, Supreme Court , 113A96-4 (Justice Phil Berger Jr.) , Published
State v. Tucker

Whether defendant's Batson claims are procedurally barred under N.C.G.S. 15A-1419.

, Supreme Court , 264A21 (Justice Tamara Barringer) , Published
State v. Beck

Evidence considered in the light most favorable to the State was sufficient to support the trial court's decision to submit multiple counts of conspiracy to the jury.

Subscribe to Supreme Court