Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 112A15 (Per Curiam) , Published
Ribelin v. Creel

Whether a plaintiff who waited seven years after filing her initial complaint for child custody and support to prosecute her claim for child support waived her right to past child support during that seven-year interim.

, Supreme Court , 90PA15 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
State v. Snead

Conviction of defendant for felony larceny based solely on lay testimony describing contents of store surveillance video; whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding inadmissible (1) the video based on lack of a proper foundation, and (2) a store employee's estimate of the value of the goods stolen.

, Supreme Court , 84A16 (Per Curiam) , Published
Faires v. State Bd. of Elections

Appeal from three-judge panel decision declaring facially unconstitutional a law permitting the voters to decide on retention of an incumbent Justice of the N.C. Supreme Court.

, Supreme Court , 389A15 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Hammonds

When defendant was questioned by police while he was involuntarily committed, whether he was in custody and required to receive Miranda warnings; whether defendant's statements were made voluntarily.

, Supreme Court , 363A15 (Justice Cheri Beasley) , Published
Herndon v. Herndon

Whether, at a hearing on plaintiff's complaint and motion for issuance of a domestic violence protective order, the trial court violated defendant's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

, Supreme Court , 252PA15 (Justice Barbara Jackson) , Published
In re D.L.W.

Termination of parental rights; whether the trial court's findings of fact supported its conclusions of law that respondent-mother's parental rights should be terminated under N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1) and (a)(2).

, Supreme Court , 223PA15 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
State v. Bishop

Constitutionality of N.C.G.S. 14-458.1(a)(1)(d), prohibiting cyber-bullying.

, Supreme Court , 72PA14 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v. McGrady

Whether the trial court abused its discretion by excluding expert witness testimony offered by defendant, pursuant to amended Rule of Evidence 702(a).

, Supreme Court , 56PA14-2 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
Kirby v. NCDOT

Whether the improvement, development, and subdivision restrictions imposed on plaintiffs' property under the Map Act, by which NCDOT identifies corridors that may be used for possible future transportation projects, amount to a taking by eminent domain.

Subscribe to Supreme Court