Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 122A16 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Curtis

Whether the movement of two victims was an integral part of an armed robbery, or sufficiently independent to permit an additional conviction for kidnapping.

, Supreme Court , 36PA16 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
State v. Barnett

Whether, in issuing a permanent no contact order under N.C.G.S. 15A-1340.50, the trial court exceeded its statutory authority by prohibiting contact with the victim's children.

, Supreme Court , 25A16 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v. Allman

Motion to suppress evidence; whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to find that probable cause existed to issue a warrant to search defendant's home.

, Supreme Court , 438A15 (Justice Barbara Jackson) , Published
Hanesbrands Inc. v. Fowler

Interlocutory appeal from decision from N.C. Business Court overruling defendant's opposition to designation of this action as a mandatory complex business case.

, Supreme Court , 360PA15 (Justice Cheri Beasley) , Published
State v. Juarez

First-degree murder conviction based on felony murder rule; whether the trial court erred in not instructing the jury on lesser-included offenses; whether the trial court committed plain error in instructing the jury on the aggressor doctrine exception to defendant's claim of self-defense.

, Supreme Court , 336PA15 (Justice Cheri Beasley) , Published
State v. Dalton

First-degree murder case in which defendant unsuccessfully argued not guilty by reason of insanity; whether prosecutor in closing argument committed prejudicial error by exaggerating defendant's chance for early release from civil commitment if she were found not guilty based on insanity.

, Supreme Court , 297PA15 (Justice Cheri Beasley) , Published
State v. Ross

Whether defendant's plea agreement was entered knowingly and voluntarily.

, Supreme Court , 278PA15 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
State v. Lowe

Trial court's denial of motion to suppress; whether the Court of Appeals correctly found that (1) probable cause supported the warrant to search the house at issue but (2) police exceeded the scope of the warrant by searching a car parked in the driveway that did not belong to a resident of the house searched.

, Supreme Court , 276PA15 (Per Curiam) , Published
In re Foreclosure of Beasley

Whether Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1) applies to non-judicial foreclosure actions under power of sale; whether a lender who files two voluntary dismissals of foreclosure actions based on the same promissory note and deed of trust is barred from filing a third power-of-sale foreclosure action.

Subscribe to Supreme Court