Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 19PA14 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v. Bartlett

Motion to suppress evidence; whether a judge can make findings of fact concerning evidence that the judge did not hear.

, Supreme Court , 123A14 (Justice Barbara Jackson) , Published
Burley v US Foods, Inc.

Workers' Compensation; Injury sustained by an employee while working out of state; Whether the N.C. Industrial Commission has subject matter jurisdiction over the employee's claim under N.C.G.S. 97-36.

, Supreme Court , 237PA14 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Gray

Whether the trial court (1) erred in allowing the State to introduce text messages from a cell phone belonging to one of defendant's co-conspirators, and (2) committed plain error in admitting a detective's opinion testimony regarding the content of text messages among all co-conspirators.

, Supreme Court , 332PA14 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Perkins

Whether defendant must testify in order to preserve an in limine objection to impeachment by prior conviction; whether prior record level is reviewable after defendant's stipulation.

, Supreme Court , 405PA14 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
State v. Ellis

Whether an indictment charging defendant with injury to personal property was fatally defective because it did not allege that both of the alleged co-owners of the damaged property had the legal ability to own property.

, Supreme Court , 49A15 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Pendergraft

Whether an indictment charging defendant with obtaining property by false pretenses was fatally defective because it failed to state the alleged false representation made by defendant.

, Supreme Court , 1A15 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Taylor

Whether the trial court committed plain error by admitting testimony from a detective that vouched for the credibility of the alleged victim.

, Supreme Court , 93A15 (Per Curiam) , Published
Town of Boone v State of North Carolina, et al.

Appealability of three orders of three-judge panel in Superior Court in Wake County, two entered on 29 December 2014 and one entered on 29 July 2015, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-27(a1).

, Supreme Court , 462A14 (Per Curiam) , Published
Byrd, et al. v Franklin County

Whether a county zoning ordinance prohibits landowners from operating a commercial shooting range on their property.

Subscribe to Supreme Court