Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 243PA12 (Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.) , Published
N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v Cully's Motorcross Park, Inc.

Whether information given by an insurance investigator to police regarding a loss caused by arson should subject the insurer to liability for malicious prosecution and for an unfair and deceptive trade practice; extent of immunity provided to insurer under N.C.G.S. ? 58-79-40 and the Noerr-Pennington doctrine

, Supreme Court , 161A12 (Justice Barbara Jackson) , Published
Applewood Props., LLC v. New S. Props., LLC

Whether an injured person may bring a civil action against a defendant pursuant to the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973's civil relief provision when the defendant has received notices of non-compliance, but has not been charged with a violation of a relevant law, rule, order, or erosion and sedimentation control plan.

, Supreme Court , 48PA11-2 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v. Rhodes

Appeal from trial court's order granting defendant's MAR following his convictions; whether trial court abused its discretion in determining that defendant met his burden to establish newly discovered evidence meriting a new trial.

, Supreme Court , 505PA10 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Hurt

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights apply to testimony before a jury in a noncapital sentencing proceeding

, Supreme Court , 322PA10 (Justice Barbara Jackson) , Published
State v. Craven

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert who did not conduct tests identifying substances as cocaine testified to the results of chemical analyses done by non-testifying chemists

, Supreme Court , 329PA11 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v. Ortiz-Zape

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert witness gave her opinion, based on the testing performed by a non-testifying chemical analyst, that the substance was cocaine.

, Supreme Court , 275PA11 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v. Brent

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert witness gave her opinion, based on the testing performed by a non-testifying chemical analyst, that the substance was cocaine.

, Supreme Court , 533PA10 (Justice Sarah Parker) , Published
State v. Williams

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert who did not conduct tests identifying a substance as cocaine testified to the results of a chemical analysis done by a non-testifying chemist

, Supreme Court , 235PA10 (Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.) , Published
State v. Brewington

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert who did not conduct tests identifying a substance as cocaine testified to the results of a chemical analysis done by a non-testifying chemist

, Supreme Court , 141PA10 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v. Hough

Whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights were violated when an expert who did not conduct tests identifying substances as marijuana and cocaine testified to the results of a chemical analysis done by a non-testifying chemist

Subscribe to Supreme Court