Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 111PA11 (Justice Patricia Timmons-Goodson) , Published
Wally v. City of Kannapolis

Whether City's zoning of a newly annexed tract of land (1) was illegal spot zoning and (2) complied with N.C.G.S. § 160A-383

, Supreme Court , 333PA11 (Per Curiam) , Published
State v Joe

Whether trial court erred in granting defendant's pretrial motions to suppress and to dismiss the charge of resisting a public officer; and resulting in the dismissal of all charges against defendant

, Supreme Court , 283PA11 (Justice Patricia Timmons-Goodson) , Published
In re P.D.R.

Application of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1242 to a waiver of counsel inquiry in a termination of parental rights hearing

, Supreme Court , 100PA11 (Justice Mark Martin) , Published
State v Lawrence

Whether the trial court committed plain error by erroneously instructing the jury on conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon when it gave proper instructions on attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon.

, Supreme Court , 386PA10 (Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.) , Published
State v Lewis

On retrial; admissibility of evidence presented at defendant's MAR hearing following his first trial on the same charges; whether defendant should have been allowed to cross-examine the victim about her identification of him and a codefendant as perpetrators of the alleged crimes; whether the trial court should have barred introduction of evidence about the weapon purportedly used by defendant; whether the Court of Appeals erred in ordering dismissal of all charges

, Supreme Court , 539A11 (Per Curiam) , Published
Mauldin v AC Corp.

Workers' Compensation; N.C.G.S. § 97-57; whether competent evidence supported Indus. Comm'n's findings on which insurance carrier had the risk for plaintiff?s asbestosis

, Supreme Court , 524PA11 (Justice Sarah Parker) , Published
State v Moore

Admission of police officer's testimony that defendant exercised his Miranda right to remain silent; plain error review

, Supreme Court , 523A11 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
State v Otto

Motion to suppress evidence of DWI; whether one of the trial court's findings of fact was supported by substantial, competent evidence; whether police had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant's vehicle

Subscribe to Supreme Court