Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 308A21 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
In re C.G.

Whether the record evidence and the trial court's findings of fact support its decision that respondent should have been involuntarily committed for additional inpatient mental health treatment.

, Supreme Court , 276A21 (Justice Sam Ervin IV) , Published
State v. Elder

Whether the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for the second of two counts of first-degree kidnapping given that the indictment alleged that defendant had confined, restrained, and removed the victim for the purpose of facilitating the commission of a first-degree rape.

, Supreme Court , 312A21 (Per Curiam) , Published
In re C.G.F.

Whether the trial court violated respondent's due process right to an impartial tribunal in an involuntary commitment proceeding when the State did not appear and the trial court elicited evidence to support committing respondent.

, Supreme Court , 309A21 (Per Curiam) , Published
In re Q.J.

Whether the trial court violated respondent's due process right to an impartial tribunal in an involuntary commitment proceeding when the State did not appear and the trial court elicited evidence to support committing respondent.

, Supreme Court , 279A21 (Per Curiam) , Published
In re E.M.D.Y.

Whether the trial judge violated respondent's due process right to an impartial tribunal in an involuntary commitment proceeding by calling a witness and eliciting testimony to support committing respondent when counsel for the State did not appear.

, Supreme Court , 317A21 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
In re R.S.H.

Whether the trial court violated respondent's confrontation right by incorporating the report of a non-testifying physician into its findings of fact and whether the trial court's findings were sufficient to support its involuntary commitment order.

, Supreme Court , 180PA21 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
West v. Hoyle's Tire & Axle, LLC

Whether an individual who lacks a legal relationship with the deceased employee can file a claim for death benefits under N.C.G.S. 97-39.

, Supreme Court , 18A22 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
State v. Lamp

Whether sufficient evidence was presented to support an inference of defendant's intent to deceive.

, Supreme Court , 9A22 (Justice Robin Hudson) , Published
McAuley v. N.C. A&T State Univ.

Whether a deceased employee's prior filing of a workers' compensation claim is sufficient to invoke the Industrial Commission's jurisdiction over a dependent's subsequent claim for death benefits under N.C.G.S. 97-24.

Subscribe to Supreme Court