Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 400A19 (Justice Mark Davis) , Published
State v. Sides

Whether defendant's due process rights were violated when the trial court determined that she was voluntarily absent from the proceedings without first conducting a competency hearing.

, Supreme Court , 484A19 (Justice Anita Earls) , Published
State v. Warden

Whether the admission of improper vouching testimony by a DSS investigator was plain error in a child sexual assault prosecution.

, Supreme Court , 319A19 (Justice Anita Earls) , Published
In re A.L.L.

Whether the trial court erred in concluding that grounds existed to terminate the parental rights of a severely mentally ill mother.

, Supreme Court , 300A93-3 (Justice Anita Earls) , Published
State v. Best

Defendant, convicted of first-degree murder, argues in a postconviction proceeding that the State failed to disclose exculpatory evidence.

, Supreme Court , 151PA18 (Justice Anita Earls) , Published
State v. Crump

Whether the trial court committed reversible error by restricting defendant's questioning of prospective jurors during voir dire.

, Supreme Court , 458A19 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
In re W.K.

Termination of parental rights for grounds stated in N.C.G.S. 7B-1111(a)(1), (2); sufficiency of performance of respondent's guardian ad litem appointed under N.C.G.S. 1A-1, Rule 17 and N.C.G.S. 7B-1101.1(d).

, Supreme Court , 426A18 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
Zander v. Orange County

Whether the trial court erred in certifying a feepayer class and a refund class pursuant to a motion filed by plaintiffs to certify classes and subclasses under Rule 23 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.

, Supreme Court , 407A19 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLC v. Trussway Mfg., Inc.

Whether, under North Carolina law, a commercial property owner who contracts for the construction of a building with a general contractor may seek to recover through a tort action against a subcontracted manufacturer of building materials for economic loss when the commercial property owner and subcontractor were not in contractual privity.

, Supreme Court , 392A19 (Justice Michael Morgan) , Published
State v. Glover

Appeal from the judgment of the trial court after a jury returned a guilty verdict on charges of possession of various controlled substances; whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that the trial court did not commit error when it instructed the jury on the theory of possession of controlled substances by 'acting in concert' based on the evidence presented at trial.

Subscribe to Supreme Court