Unpublished

, Court of Appeals , COA20-439 (Judge Darren Jackson) , Unpublished
Van Kampen v. Garcia

professional responsibility; disqualification of counsel based on conflicts of interest between former counsel and counsel associated in practice with former counsel; conflict imputation to lawyers associated in practice; Rules 1.6, 1.9, and 1.10 of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct; no appeal of right exists from the denial of a motion to disqualify opposing counsel; trial court did not err, much less abuse its discretion, in denying motion to disqualify based on imputed conflict between former counsel in the same case who became associated in practice with opposing counsel after representation was terminated

, Court of Appeals , COA20-887 (Judge Tobias Hampson) , Unpublished
State v. Shook

Waiver of counsel; NCGS 15A-1242

, Court of Appeals , COA20-543 (Judge Tobias Hampson) , Unpublished
State v. Best

Motion for Mistrial; Juror Misconduct

, Court of Appeals , COA20-53 (Judge John Tyson) , Unpublished
State v. Moore

First-degree murder; Evidence Rule 702; fingerprint testimony; right to public trial; preserved objections.

, Court of Appeals , COA20-118 (Judge Jeff Carpenter) , Unpublished
State v. Miles

malicious conduct by prisoner; ineffective assistance of counsel; plain error; lay-opinion testimony; motion to sequester witnesses; calculation of prior record level

, Court of Appeals , COA20-754 (Judge Valerie Zachary) , Unpublished
State v. Barr

Anders review; guilty plea

, Court of Appeals , COA20-486 (Judge Fred Gore) , Unpublished
State v. Kearney

Preservation, jury instructions, and self-defense

, Court of Appeals , COA20-593 (Judge Tobias Hampson) , Unpublished
State v. Salazar

Motion to Continue; Forensic Reports; Confrontation Clause

, Court of Appeals , COA20-530 (Judge Fred Gore) , Unpublished
State v. Freeman

kidnapping; restraint for the purpose of inflicting serious bodily harm; sufficiency of the evidence.

, Court of Appeals , COA20-705 (Judge John Arrowood) , Unpublished
State v. Frye

issues are whether court committed plain error by failing to inform jury of its decision to sustain objection and whether court abused its discretion by admitting alleged inflammatory evidence

Subscribe to Unpublished