Skip to main content

Christie v. Hartley Construc., Inc.

Whether the six year statute of repose bars a homeowner's claim based on a twenty year express warranty; application of same statute of repose to claims based on unfair trade practices, fraud, and willful and wanton negligence
Case Number
  • 359A13
Filed
Author
  • Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.
Type
  • Published

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

Whether the six year statute of repose bars a homeowner's claim based on a twenty year express warranty; application of same statute of repose to claims based on unfair trade practices, fraud, and willful and wanton negligence

Share this page