Skip to main content

In re K.C.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in addressing respondent's unpreserved constitutional challenge to removal of the child.
Case Number
  • 142A23
Filed
Author
  • Justice Richard Dietz
Type
  • Published

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in addressing respondent's unpreserved constitutional challenge to removal of the child.

Share this page