Skip to main content

Poole v. UNC-CH

Workers' Compensation; request by plaintiff-employee to reinstate suspended disability benefits; whether, when determining the merits of plaintiff's case, the Industrial Commission erred in failing to address a deputy commissioner's previous dismissal of the claim under Commission Rule 613
Case Number
  • 296A14
Filed
Author
  • Per Curiam
Type
  • Published

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

Workers' Compensation; request by plaintiff-employee to reinstate suspended disability benefits; whether, when determining the merits of plaintiff's case, the Industrial Commission erred in failing to address a deputy commissioner's previous dismissal of the claim under Commission Rule 613

Share this page