Skip to main content

State v. Bowditch

Whether requiring sex offenders whose crimes were committed before the satellite-based monitoring (SBM) law was enacted to enroll in SBM violates their constitutional protection against ex post facto laws
Case Number
  • 448PA09
Filed
Author
  • Justice Edward Brady
Type
  • Published

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

Whether requiring sex offenders whose crimes were committed before the satellite-based monitoring (SBM) law was enacted to enroll in SBM violates their constitutional protection against ex post facto laws

Share this page