Skip to main content

State v King

Whether the trial court abused its discretion by excluding expert testimony about repressed memory theory under Rule of Evidence 403
Case Number
  • 385A11
Filed
Author
  • Justice Robert Edmunds Jr.
Type
  • Published

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

Whether the trial court abused its discretion by excluding expert testimony about repressed memory theory under Rule of Evidence 403

Share this page