Skip to main content

State v. Vogt

Whether a defendant who committed a sex offense before enactment of the State's lifetime satellite-monitoring program was punished ex post facto when the trial court ordered him enrolled in the program; ineffective assistance of counsel; validity of defendant's plea agreement
Case Number
  • 465A09
Filed
Author
  • Per Curiam
Type
  • Published

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

Whether a defendant who committed a sex offense before enactment of the State's lifetime satellite-monitoring program was punished ex post facto when the trial court ordered him enrolled in the program; ineffective assistance of counsel; validity of defendant's plea agreement

Share this page