Skip to main content

Turpin v. Charlotte Latin Schools, Inc.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract, fraud, unfair and deceptive trade practices, and defamation failed to satisfy the notice pleading requirement.
Case Number
  • 86A23-2
Filed
Author
  • Justice Richard Dietz
Type
  • Published

Files

These files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. If you are having trouble accessing these files, you may request an accessible format.

Summary

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract, fraud, unfair and deceptive trade practices, and defamation failed to satisfy the notice pleading requirement.

Share this page