Supreme Court

, Supreme Court , 334A23 (Justice Richard Dietz) , Published
Jackson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Whether N.C.G.S. 25A-37, the anti-referral sales statute, only protects a purchaser who shows 'inducement' and whether the trial court erred in certifying a class.

, Supreme Court , 258PA23 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
State v. Wright

Whether defendant voluntarily consented to law enforcement officers' search of his backpack.

, Supreme Court , 252A23 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
Howell v. Cooper

Whether plaintiffs' Corum claims, which allege that restrictions imposed on bars during the COVID 19 pandemic violated the Fruits of the Their Own Labor Clause and Law of the Land Clause, are colorable such that sovereign immunity does not bar their suit.

, Supreme Court , 235PA23 (Justice Richard Dietz) , Published
Savage v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.

Whether courts interpreting state statutes must defer to the legal interpretation of the state agency responsible for implementing those statutes.

, Supreme Court , 158PA23 (Justice Paul Newby) , Published
Devalle v. N.C. Sheriffs' Educ. & Training Standards Comm'n

Whether the Sheriffs' Education and Training Standards Commission arbitrarily or capriciously denied petitioner's application for justice officer certification upon concluding that he lacked the good moral character required of deputy sheriffs.

, Supreme Court , 410PA18-2 (Justice Allison Riggs) , Published
Town of Apex v. Rubin

Whether title to property is revested in the landowner if a government entity takes the property for a private purpose and whether the trial court may enter a mandatory injunction to restore the property to its original condition where the landowner has not requested injunctive relief in the pleadings.

, Supreme Court , 206PA21 (Justice Allison Riggs) , Published
Town of Apex v. Rubin

Whether title to property is revested in the landowner if a government entity takes the property for a private purpose and whether the trial court may enter a mandatory injunction to restore the property to its original condition where the landowner has not requested injunctive relief in the pleadings.

, Supreme Court , 229A24 (Justice Tamara Barringer) , Published
Cutter v. Vojnovic

Whether the Business Court erred in granting a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings, granting a motion to strike portions of an affidavit on summary judgment, and disregarding a purported expert report on summary judgment; and whether the Business Court erred in granting a motion for summary judgment, because a partnership did not exist.

Subscribe to Supreme Court