Termination of parental rights;
Neglect;
Case Plan Efficacy;
Failure to understand reasons for removal;
Probable repetition of future neglect;

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-906.1(a); Removal of Custody; Review Hearings

no-merit brief; N.C.R. App. P. 3.1(e); termination of parental rights

termination of parental rights; Anders brief; no-merit appeal; N.C. Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.1(e).

First-degree murder;
Rule of Evidence 702;
Lay opinion testimony describing video footage;
Plain error;
Ineffective assistance of counsel;
Possession of a Firearm by a Felon;

Possession of a firearm by a felon; opinion testimony; speculative testimony; shorthand statement of fact; motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence; jury instructions; constructive possession

Rule of lenity; jury instructions.

probation revocation, ineffective assistance of counsel, good cause.

first-degree murder; attempted murder; discharging a firearm within an occupied enclosure with the intent to incite fear; self-defense; felony-disqualifier limiting instruction under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-51.4(1); defense of accident; unpreserved constitutional argument; Rule 2

Constitutionality of N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-415.1, possession of firearm by felon, sufficient evidence of conspiracy, circumstantial evidence of agreement beyond prior relationships or connections

motion to dismiss; sexual abuse; plain error; cumulative analysis; domestic violence; 'bad acts' evidence.

Anders brief; Alford guilty plea; PWC granted for review of non-sentencing errors

Barker factors, clerical error, right to a speedy trial

Trafficking in fentanyl;
Trafficking in cocaine;
Denial of Possession or Ownership;
Requested Jury Instruction on lesser included offense;
Simple Possession;

motion to suppress; N.C.G.S. 14-415.1; plain error; particularity; severability; plain view. 

probation revocation; absconding from supervision; abuse of discretion

Motion for Mistrial; Sustained Objection; Substantial and Irreparable Prejudice

Whether the proposed class members in a class action against a county are ascertainable and whether the proposed class satisfies the predominance and superiority criteria.

Whether the Court of Appeals erred by dismissing defendants' appeal from the trial court's interlocutory order denying defendants' motion to reconsider.